THE U.S. GOVERNMENT MEAT INSPECTOR'S UNION
National Joint Council
of Food Inspection Locals
KING OF THE JUNGLE
Home | |
FOOD SCIENCE
|

washingtonpost.com
Under Bush, the Revolving Door Gains Speed
October 27, 2005

Carol Tucker Foreman
SourceWatch
"...The senators sat dumbfounded as Dr. Margaret Haydon told of being in a meeting when officials from Monsanto Inc., the drug's manufacturer, made an offer of between $1 million and $2 million to the scientists from Health Canada -- an offer that she told the senators could only have been interpreted as a bribe..."
"...In another incident Monsanto was fined $1.5 million in Indonesia for bribing a high level official there..."
PR Watch
"...Another former Assistant Secretary of Agriculture, Carol Tucker Foreman, is the coordinator, spokesperson and lobbyist for the Safe Food Coalition, and therein lies the rub..."
"...When asked how much money she has received from Monsanto to lobby for rBGH, she angrily declined, saying "What in the world business is that of yours?"
"...Public Citizen, Public Voice and other members of the Safe Food Coalition should
"drop her like a toxic hot potato."
Michael Taylor
Resources for the Future (RFF)

SourceWatch
"...In March 1994, Taylor was publicly exposed as a former lawyer for the Monsanto corporation for seven years..."
"...Taylor did not simply fill a vacant position at the agency", says Jeffrey M. Smith in his book Seeds of Deception, "In 1991 the FDA created a new position for him: Deputy Commissioner for Policy."
"...After his stint at the FDA Taylor went back to work as Monsanto's vice-president for public policy."


Michael Taylor Named Director of RFF’s Center for Risk Management RFF
"...Prior to coming to RFF, Taylor was Vice President for Public Policy at Monsanto and a partner in the Washington, D.C. law firm King & Spalding. In addition, he served as Administrator of the USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service from 1994 to 1996, as FDA Deputy Commissioner for Policy from 1991 to 1994, and as Executive Assistant to the FDA Commissioner in 1980. He is an adjunct professor of law at Georgetown University Law Center, and received his law degree from the University of Virginia."

Implementing an Integrated, Risk-Based Food Safety System 
Michael R. Taylor

"...the National Academy of Sciences in 1998 recommended unifying the system and making it more risk-based..."
Ensuring Safe Food
From Production to Consumption

(1998)


Institute of Medicine
"The identifier "the National Academies" refers collectively to the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine and National Research Council."

Executive Summary, BOX ES-2. Changes in Federal Statutes that Would Foster and Enhance Science-based Strategies:
"Eliminate continuous inspection system for meat and poultry and replace with a science-based approach."

Michael Taylor, former Deputy Commissioner for Policy of the Food and Drug Administration and Acting Administrator of the Food Safety and Inspection Service at US Department of Agriculture:
* the current reactive-based system dates back to beginning of the century;
* shifting to science-based, preventive framework is the right track;
* for new system to be successful, need to deploy resources in a new way, and to develop preventive strategies on system-wide basis;
* current statutory and organization framework are obstacles to success due to fragmented nature of food safety research and misallocation of inspection resources;
* need to pursue organizational change due to a present lack of clearly defined responsibility and accountability; and need statutory reform.
Overlapping Responsibilities
"
...One former official who served in both USDA and FDA said that the fragmentation and diversity of the agencies' authority undercuts the government's accountability for food safety, and he added:
'FDA has jurisdiction over plants producing cheese pizza, but rarely inspects such plants. USDA has jurisdiction over plants producing pepperoni pizza, and inspects such plants on a daily basis, after having already inspected both the animal from which the pepperoni was made and the processing of the meat into pepperoni.'"
( Michael R. Taylor, "Preparing America's Food Safety System for the Twenty-First Century - Who is Responsible for What When it Comes to Meeting the Food Safety Challenges of the Consumer-Driven Global Economy?" in Food and Drug Law Journal, vol. 52, n. 1, (Washington, D.C.:Food and Drug Law Institute, 1997) 13.)
The Fazio-Durbin Food Safety Administration Bill, 1997
"...In November 1997, Representative Vic Fazio and Senator Richard Durbin introduced identical bills, the Safe Food Act of 1997."
"...This act, if passed, would consolidate all federal food safety, labeling, and inspection programs into a new independent agency known as the Food Safety Administration (FSA)."
 

Acknowledgments
Thomas Billy, Food Safety and Inspection Service
J. Clarence (Terry) Davies, Resources for the Future
James H. Hodges, American Meat Institute
Caroline Smith DeWaal, Center for Science in the Public Interest
Catherine E. Woteki, United States Department of Agriculture
Lester M. Crawford, Georgetown University
Richard J. Durbin, United States Senate
The Safe Food Act of 2005
by Congresswoman DeLauro
"A 1998 National Academy of Sciences study, Ensuring Safe Food from Production to Consumption, concluded: “a model food safety system should have a unified mission and a single official who is responsible for food safety at the federal level and who has the authority and the resources to implement science-based policy in all federal activities related to food safety.”
"That is why I introduced the Safe Food Act, legislation that would create a Food Safety Administration."
BUT WAIT!, THERE'S MORE...

President's Council on Food Safety
Assessment of the NAS Report
Ensuring Safe Food from Production to Consumption
NAS Recommendation IIa

Congress should change federal statutes so that inspection, enforcement, and research efforts can be based on scientifically supportable assessments of risks to public health.

The NAS report identifies a need for a "national food law that is clear, rational, and comprehensive, as well as scientifically based on risk" as a major component of a model food safety system. The report concludes it is necessary to revise the current statutes on food safety to create a comprehensive national food law under which:

* Inspection, enforcement, and research efforts can be based on a scientifically supportable assessment of risks to public health. This means eliminating the continuous inspection system for meat and poultry and replacing it with a science-based approach that is capable of detecting hazards of concern.

The NAS report states that the laws, particularly what the report characterizes as the requirement that there be continuous inspection of meat and poultry production through sight, smell, and touch ("organoleptic") inspection, create inefficiencies, do not allow resource use to reflect the risks involved, and inhibit the use of scientific decision-making in activities related to food safety, including the monitoring of imported food.

Janet Riley - American Meat Institute
The Cows Have Come Home
Beef is Perfectly Safe: Positive Test Result Should Not Cause Concern
Patrick Boyle - American Meat Institute

'Victory' | Dear Secretary Johanns | Five Minutes With Patrick Boyle